112 Essex Road, Leyton, London, E10 6BS
Description
Prior approval for the construction of a single storey rear extension which would extend 4.50m beyond the rear wall of the existing dwelling, a maximum height of 3.00m and an eaves height of 3.00m.
Other new applications on this street
112 Essex Road, Leyton, London, E10 6BS
Lawful Development Certificate (Proposed) - Construction of dormer roof extensio...
2 Essex Road, Leyton, London, E10 6HP
Change of use of existing dwellinghouse (Use Class C3) to a residential care fac...
SUB STATION ADJACENT ST JAMES PARK Essex Road
Change of use of disused substation to a cafe/kiosk together with formation of n...
67 Essex Road, Leyton, London, E10 6EG
Lawful Development Certificate (Proposed) - Construction of dormer roof extensio...
Nearby new applications
12 Grosvenor Rise East, Walthamstow, London, E17 9LB
Installation of a new entrance door with canopy and window to side elevation, ne...
105 Abbotts Park Road, Leyton, London, E10 6HU
Construction of a single storey rear extension and installation of door at groun...
119 Maynard Road, Walthamstow, London, E17 9JE
Construction of single storey wraparound rear extension.
68 Sandringham Road, Leyton, London, E10 6HJ
Prior approval for the construction of a single storey rear extension which woul...
20 Epsom Road, Leyton, London, E10 6ES
Lawful Development Certificate (Existing)- Retention of rear roof terrace.
218 Colchester Road, Leyton, London, E10 6HQ
Change of use from dwellinghouse (Use Class C3) to children's care home ( Use Cl...
Historical activity at this location
25 nearby applications on record - archival context, not part of the live application.
Nearby activity
Waltham Forest is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #81 out of 292. Only 20% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 40% national average - the council usually decides on time. Waltham Forest is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 77% approved vs 90% nationally.